How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Samoa?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Maldives vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Maldives

30.56

in 2019

Samoa

30.56

in 2019

Maldives rank

151st

Samoa rank

151st

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Maldives
Samoa

How they compare

Maldives currently reports 30.56 against 30.56 in Samoa, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Maldives ranks 151st and Samoa ranks 151st of 191 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Maldives or Samoa?: Maldives, at 30.56 against 30.56 in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Maldives and Samoa?: 0, with Maldives ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Samoa?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Maldives and Samoa rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Maldives ranks 151st and Samoa ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Maldives vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/maldives/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/maldives/samoa/">Maldives vs Samoa: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.