Libya vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Libya
22.22
in 2019
Sudan
22.22
in 2019
Libya rank
176th
Sudan rank
176th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

  • Libya
  • Sudan
05101520201520172019

How they compare

Libya currently reports 22.22 against 22.22 in Sudan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 176th of 190 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Libya or Sudan?
Libya, at 22.22 against 22.22 in Sudan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Libya and Sudan?
0, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Sudan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Libya and Sudan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
Libya ranks 176th and Sudan ranks 176th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/libya/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/libya/sudan/">Libya vs Sudan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.