Latvia vs Mauritius: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Latvia
75
in 2019
Mauritius
75
in 2019
Latvia rank
16th
Mauritius rank
16th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Latvia
- Mauritius
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 75 against 75 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mauritius ahead.
Latvia ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 191 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Latvia or Mauritius?
- Latvia, at 75 against 75 in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Latvia and Mauritius?
- 0, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mauritius?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Mauritius rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Latvia ranks 16th and Mauritius ranks 16th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.