Republic of Korea vs United Arab Emirates: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Republic of Korea
80.56
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
77.78
in 2019
Republic of Korea rank
10th
United Arab Emirates rank
11th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Republic of Korea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 80.56 against 77.78 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 2.78.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Republic of Korea ranks 10th and United Arab Emirates ranks 11th of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Republic of Korea or United Arab Emirates?
- Republic of Korea, at 80.56 against 77.78 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Republic of Korea and United Arab Emirates?
- 2.78, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and United Arab Emirates?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Korea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Republic of Korea ranks 10th and United Arab Emirates ranks 11th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.