South Korea vs Romania: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
South Korea
80.56
in 2019
Romania
77.78
in 2019
South Korea rank
10th
Romania rank
11th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- South Korea
- Romania
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 80.56 against 77.78 in Romania, a difference of 2.78.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 10th and Romania ranks 11th of 191 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), South Korea or Romania?
- South Korea, at 80.56 against 77.78 in Romania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between South Korea and Romania?
- 2.78, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do South Korea and Romania rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- South Korea ranks 10th and Romania ranks 11th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.