How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Madagascar?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Jordan vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Jordan

44.44

in 2019

Madagascar

44.44

in 2019

Jordan rank

94th

Madagascar rank

94th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Jordan
Madagascar

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 94th and Madagascar ranks 94th of 191 countries.

Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Jordan or Madagascar?: Jordan, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Madagascar as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Jordan and Madagascar?: 0, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Madagascar?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Jordan and Madagascar rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Jordan ranks 94th and Madagascar ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/jordan/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/jordan/madagascar/">Jordan vs Madagascar: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.