Japan vs Kuwait: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Japan
41.67
in 2019
Kuwait
41.67
in 2019
Japan rank
109th
Kuwait rank
109th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Japan
- Kuwait
How they compare
Japan currently reports 41.67 against 41.67 in Kuwait, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 109th and Kuwait ranks 109th of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Japan or Kuwait?
- Japan, at 41.67 against 41.67 in Kuwait as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Japan and Kuwait?
- 0, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Kuwait?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Japan and Kuwait rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Japan ranks 109th and Kuwait ranks 109th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.