Iraq vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Iraq
8.33
in 2019
Timor-Leste
13.89
in 2019
Iraq rank
191st
Timor-Leste rank
190th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Iraq
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 13.89 against 8.33 in Iraq, a difference of 5.56.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.7 times Iraq's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Iraq ranks 191st and Timor-Leste ranks 190th of 191 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Iraq or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 13.89 against 8.33 in Iraq as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Iraq and Timor-Leste?
- 5.56, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iraq and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Iraq ranks 191st and Timor-Leste ranks 190th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.