Georgia vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Georgia
66.67
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
63.89
in 2019
Georgia rank
33rd
Saudi Arabia rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Georgia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 66.67 against 63.89 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 2.78.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 33rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Georgia or Saudi Arabia?
- Georgia, at 66.67 against 63.89 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
- 2.78, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Saudi Arabia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Georgia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Georgia ranks 33rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.