El Salvador vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

El Salvador
44.44
in 2019
Jordan
44.44
in 2019
El Salvador rank
94th
Jordan rank
94th

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

  • El Salvador
  • Jordan
010203040201520172019

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 44.44 against 44.44 in Jordan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 94th of 191 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), El Salvador or Jordan?
El Salvador, at 44.44 against 44.44 in Jordan as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between El Salvador and Jordan?
0, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jordan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do El Salvador and Jordan rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
El Salvador ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 94th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/el-salvador/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/el-salvador/jordan/">El Salvador vs Jordan: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.