Denmark vs United States of America: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Denmark
77.78
in 2019
United States of America
81.11
in 2019
Denmark rank
11th
United States of America rank
9th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Denmark
- United States of America
How they compare
United States of America currently reports 81.11 against 77.78 in Denmark, a difference of 3.33.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was United States of America ahead.
Denmark ranks 11th and United States of America ranks 9th of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Denmark or United States of America?
- United States of America, at 81.11 against 77.78 in Denmark as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Denmark and United States of America?
- 3.33, with United States of America ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United States of America?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Denmark and United States of America rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Denmark ranks 11th and United States of America ranks 9th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.