What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Central African Republic and Mongolia?

0, with Central African Republic ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mongolia?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Central African Republic vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)

Central African Republic

30.56

in 2019

Mongolia

30.56

in 2019

Central African Republic rank

151st

Mongolia rank

151st

Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time

Central African Republic
Mongolia

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 30.56 against 30.56 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 151st and Mongolia ranks 151st of 191 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Central African Republic or Mongolia?: Central African Republic, at 30.56 against 30.56 in Mongolia as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Central African Republic and Mongolia?: 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mongolia?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Mongolia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?: Central African Republic ranks 151st and Mongolia ranks 151st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19). Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/central-african-republic/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-quality-of-the-judicial-processes-index-0-19-db17-20-methodology-score/central-african-republic/mongolia/">Central African Republic vs Mongolia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 24 August 2026

The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.