Brunei Darussalam vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Brunei Darussalam
63.89
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
63.89
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
36th
Saudi Arabia rank
36th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 63.89 against 63.89 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 36th and Saudi Arabia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Brunei Darussalam or Saudi Arabia?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 63.89 against 63.89 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Brunei Darussalam and Saudi Arabia?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Saudi Arabia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 36th and Saudi Arabia ranks 36th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.