Brazil vs Malaysia: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Brazil
72.69
in 2019
Malaysia
72.22
in 2019
Brazil rank
23rd
Malaysia rank
24th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Brazil
- Malaysia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 72.69 against 72.22 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malaysia ahead.
Brazil ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Brazil or Malaysia?
- Brazil, at 72.69 against 72.22 in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Brazil and Malaysia?
- 0.47, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Malaysia rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Brazil ranks 23rd and Malaysia ranks 24th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.