Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Costa Rica: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
52.78
in 2019
Costa Rica
52.78
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
63rd
Costa Rica rank
63rd
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 52.78 against 52.78 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Costa Rica ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Costa Rica?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 52.78 against 52.78 in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Costa Rica rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 63rd and Costa Rica ranks 63rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.