Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Kiribati: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
33.33
in 2019
Kiribati
33.33
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
145th
Kiribati rank
145th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Kiribati
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 33.33 against 33.33 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 145th and Kiribati ranks 145th of 191 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Kiribati?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 33.33 against 33.33 in Kiribati as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Kiribati?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Kiribati?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Kiribati rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 145th and Kiribati ranks 145th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.