Argentina vs Hungary: Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)
Argentina
69.44
in 2019
Hungary
69.44
in 2019
Argentina rank
29th
Hungary rank
29th
Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) over time
- Argentina
- Hungary
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 69.44 against 69.44 in Hungary, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 29th and Hungary ranks 29th of 191 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19), Argentina or Hungary?
- Argentina, at 69.44 against 69.44 in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) between Argentina and Hungary?
- 0, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Hungary?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Argentina and Hungary rank globally for enforcing contracts: quality of the judicial processes index (0-19)?
- Argentina ranks 29th and Hungary ranks 29th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Quality of the judicial processes index (0-19) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for quality of judicial processes index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.