Chile vs Saudi Arabia: Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score
Chile
64.72
in 2019
Saudi Arabia
65.26
in 2019
Chile rank
53rd
Saudi Arabia rank
51st
Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Chile
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 65.26 against 64.72 in Chile, a difference of 0.54.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 53rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 188 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score, Chile or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 65.26 against 64.72 in Chile as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score between Chile and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.54, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Saudi Arabia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Chile and Saudi Arabia rank globally for enforcing contracts (db17-20 methodology) - score?
- Chile ranks 53rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 51st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for enforcing contracts is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the time and cost for resolving a commercial dispute through a local first-instance court, as well as the quality of judicial processes that promotes quality and efficiency in the court system. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.