Spain vs Sweden: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Spain
- Sweden
How they compare
Spain currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sweden, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Spain ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 67th of 188 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Spain or Sweden?
- Spain, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sweden as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Spain and Sweden?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Sweden?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Spain and Sweden rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Spain ranks 67th and Sweden ranks 67th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.