Sao Tome and Principe vs Timor-Leste: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd and Timor-Leste ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Sao Tome and Principe or Timor-Leste?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Timor-Leste as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Sao Tome and Principe and Timor-Leste?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Timor-Leste?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Timor-Leste rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd and Timor-Leste ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.