How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Rwanda vs Singapore: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Rwanda

4.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Singapore

4.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Rwanda rank

14th

Singapore rank

14th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

Rwanda
Singapore

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Singapore, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 14th and Singapore ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Rwanda or Singapore?: Rwanda, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Singapore as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Rwanda and Singapore?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Rwanda and Singapore rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?: Rwanda ranks 14th and Singapore ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.