Poland vs Ukraine: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Poland
5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Ukraine
5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Poland rank
1st
Ukraine rank
1st

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Poland
  • Ukraine
012345201520172019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 5 DB17-20 methodology against 5 DB17-20 methodology in Ukraine, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Poland ahead.

Poland ranks 1st and Ukraine ranks 1st of 188 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Poland or Ukraine?
Poland, at 5 DB17-20 methodology against 5 DB17-20 methodology in Ukraine as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Poland and Ukraine?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Ukraine?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Poland and Ukraine rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Poland ranks 1st and Ukraine ranks 1st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Ukraine: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/poland/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/poland/ukraine/">Poland vs Ukraine: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.