Netherlands vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Netherlands
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Seychelles
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Netherlands rank
94th
Seychelles rank
94th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Netherlands
  • Seychelles
0123201520172019

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Seychelles, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Netherlands ahead.

Netherlands ranks 94th and Seychelles ranks 94th of 188 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Netherlands or Seychelles?
Netherlands, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Seychelles as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Netherlands and Seychelles?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Seychelles?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Netherlands and Seychelles rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Netherlands ranks 94th and Seychelles ranks 94th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 16 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/netherlands/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/netherlands/seychelles/">Netherlands vs Seychelles: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.