Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Namibia
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
1.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Namibia rank
172nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
172nd

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Namibia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.511.5201520172019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Sao Tome and Principe has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 172nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd of 191 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Namibia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Namibia, at 1.5 DB17-20 methodology against 1.5 DB17-20 methodology in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Namibia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Namibia ranks 172nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 172nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/namibia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/namibia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Namibia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.