How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Rwanda?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Lesotho vs Rwanda: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Lesotho

4.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Rwanda

4.5 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Lesotho rank

14th

Rwanda rank

14th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

Lesotho
Rwanda

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Rwanda, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Lesotho or Rwanda?: Lesotho, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Rwanda as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Lesotho and Rwanda?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Rwanda?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Lesotho and Rwanda rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?: Lesotho ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.