Iran, Islamic Republic of vs Iraq: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Iraq
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Iraq, a difference of 0.5 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Iran, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 189th and Iraq ranks 190th of 190 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Iran, Islamic Republic of or Iraq?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 0.5 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Iraq as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Iran, Islamic Republic of and Iraq?
- 0.5 DB17-20 methodology, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran, Islamic Republic of and Iraq?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Iran, Islamic Republic of and Iraq rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 189th and Iraq ranks 190th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.