Hong Kong, China vs Niger: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Niger
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Niger, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 14th and Niger ranks 14th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Hong Kong, China or Niger?
- Hong Kong, China, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Niger as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Hong Kong, China and Niger?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Niger?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Niger rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 14th and Niger ranks 14th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.