Grenada vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Grenada
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Grenada rank
14th
Hong Kong, China rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Grenada
  • Hong Kong, China
012345201520172019

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 14th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Grenada or Hong Kong, China?
Grenada, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Grenada and Hong Kong, China?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Hong Kong, China?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Hong Kong, China rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Grenada ranks 14th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/grenada/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/grenada/hong-kong-sar-china/">Grenada vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.