How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?

5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Libya: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Ecuador

2 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Libya

2 DB17-20 methodology

in 2019

Ecuador rank

157th

Libya rank

157th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

Ecuador
Libya

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Libya, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 157th and Libya ranks 157th of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Ecuador or Libya?: Ecuador, at 2 DB17-20 methodology against 2 DB17-20 methodology in Libya as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Ecuador and Libya?: 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Libya?: 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Ecuador and Libya rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?: Ecuador ranks 157th and Libya ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?: The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit: DB17-20 methodology
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.