Côte d'Ivoire vs Hong Kong, China: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 14th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Côte d'Ivoire or Hong Kong, China?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Côte d'Ivoire and Hong Kong, China?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Hong Kong, China?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Hong Kong, China rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 14th and Hong Kong, China ranks 14th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.