Brunei Darussalam vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Brunei Darussalam
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Malta
3 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
95th
Malta rank
95th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Brunei Darussalam
  • Malta
0123201520172019

How they compare

Brunei Darussalam currently reports 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Malta, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Brunei Darussalam ranks 95th and Malta ranks 95th of 190 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Brunei Darussalam or Malta?
Brunei Darussalam, at 3 DB17-20 methodology against 3 DB17-20 methodology in Malta as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Brunei Darussalam and Malta?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Malta?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Brunei Darussalam and Malta rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Brunei Darussalam ranks 95th and Malta ranks 95th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brunei Darussalam vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/brunei-darussalam/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/brunei-darussalam/malta/">Brunei Darussalam vs Malta: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.