Brazil vs Canada: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time
- Brazil
- Canada
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 4.08 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Canada, a difference of 0.08 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 52nd and Canada ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Brazil or Canada?
- Brazil, at 4.08 DB17-20 methodology against 4 DB17-20 methodology in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Brazil and Canada?
- 0.08 DB17-20 methodology, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Canada?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Brazil and Canada rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
- Brazil ranks 52nd and Canada ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.