Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Belgium
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Côte d'Ivoire
4.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Belgium rank
14th
Côte d'Ivoire rank
14th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Belgium
  • Côte d'Ivoire
012345201520172019

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Belgium ahead.

Belgium ranks 14th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 14th of 191 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Belgium or Côte d'Ivoire?
Belgium, at 4.5 DB17-20 methodology against 4.5 DB17-20 methodology in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Belgium and Côte d'Ivoire rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Belgium ranks 14th and Côte d'Ivoire ranks 14th of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/belgium/cote-d-ivoire/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/belgium/cote-d-ivoire/">Belgium vs Côte d'Ivoire: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 955 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.