Albania vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)

Albania
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Philippines
3.5 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Albania rank
68th
Philippines rank
68th

Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) over time

  • Albania
  • Philippines
01234201520172019

How they compare

Albania currently reports 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Philippines, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 68th and Philippines ranks 68th of 190 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5), Albania or Philippines?
Albania, at 3.5 DB17-20 methodology against 3.5 DB17-20 methodology in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5) between Albania and Philippines?
0 DB17-20 methodology, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Philippines?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
How do Albania and Philippines rank globally for enforcing contracts: court structure and proceedings (0-5)?
Albania ranks 68th and Philippines ranks 68th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Albania vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5). Statizoid. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/albania/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/enforcing-contracts-court-structure-and-proceedings-0-5-db17-20-methodology/albania/philippines/">Albania vs Philippines: Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Court structure and proceedings (0-5) (DB17-20 methodology)
Unit
DB17-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 950 data points, 2015–2019
Last refreshed

The court structure and proceedings evaluates five aspects of the court system: (i) whether a specialized commercial court, division or section is available; (ii) whether a small claims court and/or simplified procedure for small claims is available; (iii) whether pretrial attachment of defendant's movable assets is available; (iv) whether new cases are assigned randomly and through an automated system to judges; and (v) whether a woman’s testimony in court carries the same evidentiary weight as that of a man's. The index is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.