Maldives vs Chinese Taipei: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Maldives
18.5%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
18.3%
in 2019
Maldives rank
162nd
Chinese Taipei rank
164th
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Maldives
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 18.5% against 18.3% in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.2%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 162nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 164th of 190 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.5% | 18.3% | 0.2% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 18.5% | 18.3% | 0.2% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Maldives or Chinese Taipei?
- Maldives, at 18.5% against 18.3% in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Maldives and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.2%, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Maldives and Chinese Taipei rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Maldives ranks 162nd and Chinese Taipei ranks 164th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.