Kuwait vs Maldives: Enforcing contracts: Cost

Kuwait
18.6%
in 2019
Maldives
18.5%
in 2019
Kuwait rank
158th
Maldives rank
160th

Enforcing contracts: Cost over time

  • Kuwait
  • Maldives
05101520200320112019

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 18.6% against 18.5% in Maldives, a difference of 0.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Maldives ahead.

Kuwait ranks 158th and Maldives ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Maldives Difference Ahead
2000s 14.3% 18.5% 4.2% Maldives
2010s 16.9% 18.5% 1.6% Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Kuwait or Maldives?
Kuwait, at 18.6% against 18.5% in Maldives as of 2019.
What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Kuwait and Maldives?
0.1%, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Maldives?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Kuwait and Maldives rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
Kuwait ranks 158th and Maldives ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim)
Unit
% of claim
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.