Iran vs Maldives: Enforcing contracts: Cost
Iran
19.3%
in 2019
Maldives
18.5%
in 2019
Iran rank
159th
Maldives rank
162nd
Enforcing contracts: Cost over time
- Iran
- Maldives
How they compare
Iran currently reports 19.3% against 18.5% in Maldives, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Maldives ahead.
Iran ranks 159th and Maldives ranks 162nd of 190 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 18.5% | 1.5% | Maldives |
| 2010s | 17.9% | 18.5% | 0.6% | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher enforcing contracts: cost, Iran or Maldives?
- Iran, at 19.3% against 18.5% in Maldives as of 2019.
- What is the difference in enforcing contracts: cost between Iran and Maldives?
- 0.8%, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Maldives?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Iran and Maldives rank globally for enforcing contracts: cost?
- Iran ranks 159th and Maldives ranks 162nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Enforcing contracts: Cost (% of claim). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The cost to enforce contracts is recorded as a percentage of the claim value, assumed to be equivalent to 200% of income per capita or $5,000, whichever is greater. Three types of costs are recorded: average attorney fees, court costs and enforcement costs. Bribes are not taken into account.