Mongolia vs South Africa: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per

Mongolia
0.0118 units per square kilometre
in 2019
South Africa
0.0127 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Mongolia rank
141st
South Africa rank
139th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per over time

  • Mongolia
  • South Africa
0.0050.0070.010.0130.015196119902019

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 0.0127 units per square kilometre against 0.0118 units per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0009 units per square kilometre.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 141st and South Africa ranks 139th of 189 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0047 units per square kilometre 0.0141 units per square kilometre 0.0093 units per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.005 units per square kilometre 0.0137 units per square kilometre 0.0086 units per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.0051 units per square kilometre 0.0138 units per square kilometre 0.0087 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 0.0061 units per square kilometre 0.0141 units per square kilometre 0.008 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 0.0059 units per square kilometre 0.014 units per square kilometre 0.0081 units per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 0.0087 units per square kilometre 0.0136 units per square kilometre 0.0048 units per square kilometre South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per, Mongolia or South Africa?
South Africa, at 0.0127 units per square kilometre against 0.0118 units per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per between Mongolia and South Africa?
0.0009 units per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per?
Mongolia ranks 141st and South Africa ranks 139th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs South Africa: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/south-africa/">Mongolia vs South Africa: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,097 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.