How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?

59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per

Malta

0.1183 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Nepal

0.1156 units per square kilometre

in 2019

Malta rank

8th

Nepal rank

9th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per over time

Malta
Nepal

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.1183 units per square kilometre against 0.1156 units per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 0.0027 units per square kilometre.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 8th and Nepal ranks 9th of 189 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Nepal	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0907 units per square kilometre	0.0486 units per square kilometre	0.042 units per square kilometre	Malta
1970s	0.1106 units per square kilometre	0.0602 units per square kilometre	0.0504 units per square kilometre	Malta
1980s	0.1289 units per square kilometre	0.0738 units per square kilometre	0.0551 units per square kilometre	Malta
1990s	0.1734 units per square kilometre	0.081 units per square kilometre	0.0924 units per square kilometre	Malta
2000s	0.1582 units per square kilometre	0.0939 units per square kilometre	0.0643 units per square kilometre	Malta
2010s	0.125 units per square kilometre	0.1111 units per square kilometre	0.014 units per square kilometre	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per, Malta or Nepal?: Malta, at 0.1183 units per square kilometre against 0.1156 units per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per between Malta and Nepal?: 0.0027 units per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Nepal?: 59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Malta and Nepal rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per?: Malta ranks 8th and Nepal ranks 9th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/malta/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/malta/nepal/">Malta vs Nepal: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre
Unit: units per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 189 places, 10,097 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed: 02 September 2026

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.