Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per

Hong Kong, China
0.0072 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Sweden
0.0071 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
152nd
Sweden rank
153rd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Sweden
0.010.020.030.04196119902019

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0072 units per square kilometre against 0.0071 units per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0001 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 152nd and Sweden ranks 153rd of 189 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 4 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0301 units per square kilometre 0.0136 units per square kilometre 0.0166 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 0.0295 units per square kilometre 0.0107 units per square kilometre 0.0188 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 0.018 units per square kilometre 0.0102 units per square kilometre 0.0077 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.0079 units per square kilometre 0.0095 units per square kilometre 0.0016 units per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0081 units per square kilometre 0.0085 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0078 units per square kilometre 0.0077 units per square kilometre 0.0001 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per, Hong Kong, China or Sweden?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.0072 units per square kilometre against 0.0071 units per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per between Hong Kong, China and Sweden?
0.0001 units per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Sweden?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong, China and Sweden rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per?
Hong Kong, China ranks 152nd and Sweden ranks 153rd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/sweden/">Hong Kong, China vs Sweden: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,097 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.