Finland vs French Polynesia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per

Finland
0.0062 units per square kilometre
in 2019
French Polynesia
0.0049 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Finland rank
158th
French Polynesia rank
160th

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per over time

  • Finland
  • French Polynesia
0.0050.010.0150.02196119902019

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.0062 units per square kilometre against 0.0049 units per square kilometre in French Polynesia, a difference of 0.0013 units per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.3 times French Polynesia's.

Across all 59 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 158th and French Polynesia ranks 160th of 189 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland French Polynesia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0175 units per square kilometre 0.0066 units per square kilometre 0.0109 units per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0143 units per square kilometre 0.0044 units per square kilometre 0.0099 units per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.0121 units per square kilometre 0.005 units per square kilometre 0.0071 units per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.009 units per square kilometre 0.0048 units per square kilometre 0.0041 units per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.0073 units per square kilometre 0.0052 units per square kilometre 0.0021 units per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.0067 units per square kilometre 0.0049 units per square kilometre 0.0017 units per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per, Finland or French Polynesia?
Finland, at 0.0062 units per square kilometre against 0.0049 units per square kilometre in French Polynesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per between Finland and French Polynesia?
0.0013 units per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and French Polynesia?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Finland and French Polynesia rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per?
Finland ranks 158th and French Polynesia ranks 160th of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs French Polynesia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/finland/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/finland/french-polynesia/">Finland vs French Polynesia: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,097 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.