Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per

Australia
0.0076 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Hong Kong, China
0.0072 units per square kilometre
in 2019
Australia rank
151st
Hong Kong, China rank
152nd

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per over time

  • Australia
  • Hong Kong, China
0.010.020.030.04196119902019

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0076 units per square kilometre against 0.0072 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0004 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 59 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Australia ranks 151st and Hong Kong, China ranks 152nd of 189 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0092 units per square kilometre 0.0301 units per square kilometre 0.0209 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1970s 0.011 units per square kilometre 0.0295 units per square kilometre 0.0185 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1980s 0.0095 units per square kilometre 0.018 units per square kilometre 0.0084 units per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.0097 units per square kilometre 0.0079 units per square kilometre 0.0018 units per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0092 units per square kilometre 0.0081 units per square kilometre 0.001 units per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0083 units per square kilometre 0.0078 units per square kilometre 0.0005 units per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per, Australia or Hong Kong, China?
Australia, at 0.0076 units per square kilometre against 0.0072 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2019.
What is the difference in emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per between Australia and Hong Kong, China?
0.0004 units per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong, China?
59 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2019.
How do Australia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for emission totals - emissions (co2eq) (ar5) - enteric fermentation, per?
Australia ranks 151st and Hong Kong, China ranks 152nd of 189 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/australia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/emission-totals-emissions-co2eq-ar5-enteric-fermentation-per-square-kilometre/australia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Australia vs Hong Kong, China: Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
189 places, 10,097 data points, 1961–2019
Last refreshed

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.