Romania vs Uganda: Chief executive of the government is elected
Romania
1
in 2025
Uganda
1
in 2025
Romania rank
1st
Uganda rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Romania
- Uganda
How they compare
Romania currently reports 1 against 1 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 132 shared years of data; in 1894 it was Uganda ahead.
Romania ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Romania |
| 1920s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Romania |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Romania |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Romania |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Romania |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Romania |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Romania |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Romania |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Romania or Uganda?
- Romania, at 1 against 1 in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Romania and Uganda?
- 0, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Uganda?
- 132 years are reported by both, from 1894 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Uganda rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Romania ranks 1st and Uganda ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.