Palau vs Zimbabwe: Chief executive of the government is elected

Palau
1
in 2025
Zimbabwe
1
in 2025
Palau rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Palau
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.60.81189519602025

How they compare

Palau currently reports 1 against 1 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Palau ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Palau averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Palau Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0.5 0.5 Zimbabwe
1970s 0 1 1 Zimbabwe
1980s 0.9 1 0.1 Zimbabwe
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 0.9 0.1 Palau
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Palau or Zimbabwe?
Palau, at 1 against 1 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Palau and Zimbabwe?
0, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Palau and Zimbabwe?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Palau and Zimbabwe rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Palau ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.