Nepal vs Palau: Chief executive of the government is elected

Nepal
1
in 2025
Palau
1
in 2025
Nepal rank
1st
Palau rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Nepal
  • Palau
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 1 against 1 in Palau, a difference of 0.

Across all 79 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Palau Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0.9 0.9 Palau
1990s 0.9 1 0.1 Palau
2000s 0.6 1 0.4 Palau
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Nepal or Palau?
Nepal, at 1 against 1 in Palau as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Nepal and Palau?
0, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Palau?
79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
How do Nepal and Palau rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Nepal ranks 1st and Palau ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.