Mauritius vs Pakistan: Chief executive of the government is elected
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Pakistan
1
in 2025
Mauritius rank
1st
Pakistan rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Mauritius
- Pakistan
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1 against 1 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 79 shared years of data; in 1947 it was Pakistan ahead.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 4 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Pakistan |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | Pakistan |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.7 | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Mauritius or Pakistan?
- Mauritius, at 1 against 1 in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Mauritius and Pakistan?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Pakistan?
- 79 years are reported by both, from 1947 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Pakistan rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Pakistan ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.