Mauritius vs Moldova: Chief executive of the government is elected
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Moldova
1
in 2025
Mauritius rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Mauritius
- Moldova
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1 against 1 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
Across all 121 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Moldova |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Mauritius or Moldova?
- Mauritius, at 1 against 1 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Mauritius and Moldova?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Moldova?
- 121 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Mauritius and Moldova rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.