Lithuania vs Nauru: Chief executive of the government is elected
Lithuania
1
in 2025
Nauru
1
in 2025
Lithuania rank
1st
Nauru rank
1st
Chief executive of the government is elected over time
- Lithuania
- Nauru
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 1 against 1 in Nauru, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Nauru ahead.
Lithuania ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Lithuania |
| 1930s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Lithuania |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lithuania |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Lithuania |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.4 | 0.6 | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Lithuania or Nauru?
- Lithuania, at 1 against 1 in Nauru as of 2025.
- What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Lithuania and Nauru?
- 0, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Nauru?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Nauru rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
- Lithuania ranks 1st and Nauru ranks 1st of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves — such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization — as not holding executive elections.