Latvia vs Romania: Chief executive of the government is elected

Latvia
1
in 2025
Romania
1
in 2025
Latvia rank
1st
Romania rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Latvia
  • Romania
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1 against 1 in Romania, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Romania ahead.

Latvia ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Romania Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0.5 0.5 Romania
1920s 1 0.2 0.8 Latvia
1930s 0.4 0 0.4 Latvia
1940s 1 0.4 0.6 Latvia
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Latvia or Romania?
Latvia, at 1 against 1 in Romania as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Latvia and Romania?
0, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Latvia ranks 1st and Romania ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.