Laos vs Malta: Chief executive of the government is elected

Laos
1
in 2025
Malta
1
in 2025
Laos rank
1st
Malta rank
1st

Chief executive of the government is elected over time

  • Laos
  • Malta
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Laos currently reports 1 against 1 in Malta, a difference of 0.

Across all 186 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Laos ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 197 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Laos Malta Difference Ahead
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.3 0.3 Malta
1950s 0.6 1 0.4 Malta
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 0.5 1 0.5 Malta
1980s 0.1 1 0.9 Malta
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 0.6 1 0.4 Malta
2010s 0.9 1 0.1 Malta
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher chief executive of the government is elected, Laos or Malta?
Laos, at 1 against 1 in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in chief executive of the government is elected between Laos and Malta?
0, with Laos ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Laos and Malta?
186 years are reported by both, from 1840 to 2025.
How do Laos and Malta rank globally for chief executive of the government is elected?
Laos ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Chief executive of the government is elected. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Chief executive of the government is elected
Source
Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 32,485 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

The variable indicates whether some citizens directly or indirectly elect the chief executive. It considers political system which do not govern themselves β€” such as due to external interventions, occupations, or colonization β€” as not holding executive elections.